Rational octonion multiplication is not associative
ProvedOctonion.exists_not_assocalgebracayley-integersoctonion-arithmeticoctonions
Use the Cayley–Dickson model , with and . Work over .
This shows why an associative ring interface does not describe rational octonions.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_Octonion_octonions import Definitions.Def_Octonion_toRat8 import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring open Quaternion Octonion BigOperators
Formal statement
theorem Octonion.exists_not_assoc : ∃ x y z : octonions ℚ, (x * y) * z ≠ x * (y * z) := by sorry
Source
Standard reference: John H. Conway and Derek A. Smith, On Quaternions and Octonions: Their Geometry, Arithmetic, and Symmetry, A K Peters, 2003. https://www.routledge.com/On-Quaternions-and-Octonions/Conway-Smith/p/book/9781568811345. Relevant topics appear in Chapter 6 (composition algebras), Chapter 9 (octavian integers), and Section 10.1 (the 240 octavian units), as confirmed by the publisher's table of contents. Supporting exposition: John Baez, Integral Octonions (Part 6), September 17, 2013, https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/integers/integers_6.html. These references concern the classical mathematics. This contribution supplies Lean definitions and machine-checked proofs in the stated coordinate convention; it does not claim new mathematical results or reproduce a particular proof from the book. The topic references do not assert that the exact Lean statement occurs there. Verification of the book references is limited to its table of contents, not a statement-by-statement comparison with the book; no page-specific or numbered theorem attribution is claimed. Local formalization: Basic/Thm_Octonion_exists_not_assoc.lean, line 6; SHA-256 1ba7e67bec466f3a200da032337ed7e6db34bd8e96e43ed9e8aaad9bab13d810. No public source repository is claimed.