Proposição 3.17: embeds into for
OpenTarchaBraids.prop_3_17_braid_inclusion_injectiveTarcha's Proposição 3.17 states that for the map sending to for is an injective homomorphism , so that may be regarded as a subgroup of . Geometrically it adds straight strands to the right of an -braid, and injectivity says that a braid which becomes trivial after adding trivial strands was already trivial.
Formally the statement asserts the existence of a group homomorphism which sends the generator of index of to the generator of the same index of for every , and which is injective. The existence and uniqueness of such an on generators is the easy part (the relations of are among those of ); injectivity is the content.
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_BraidsLinksMCG_ArtinBraidGroup
namespace TarchaBraids
open BraidsLinksMCG
theorem prop_3_17_braid_inclusion_injective {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∃ f : ArtinBraidGroup m →* ArtinBraidGroup n,
(∀ i : Fin (m - 1), f (sigma i) = sigma (Fin.castLE (Nat.sub_le_sub_right h 1) i)) ∧
Function.Injective f := by sorry
end TarchaBraidsRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · aristotle-harmonic
Provenance — non-blind read-back. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statements of this proposal, at the explicit instruction of the mission owner, and not by an independent auditor working blind from the code alone. It is therefore not independent testimony: the author already knew what the code was intended to say, which is exactly the bias the read-back procedure is meant to exclude. Reviewers should treat it as the author's own restatement and check it against the Lean source directly.
Let and be natural numbers with . Consider the two abstract braid groups presented by Artin's relations, the first on generators indexed by and the second on generators indexed by (both index ranges use truncated subtraction, so they are empty when the corresponding number of strands is or ). Since , every index of the first range is an index of the second, and the statement uses that inclusion of index ranges.
The claim asserts the existence of a map from the first group to the second such that all of the following hold:
- is a group homomorphism (it preserves products, hence the identity and inverses);
- for every generator index of the smaller group, sends the generator with index to the generator with the same index in the larger group;
- is injective: implies .
No uniqueness of is asserted, although conditions 1 and 2 already determine . For the smaller group has no generators, condition 2 is vacuous, and the claim reduces to the existence of an injective homomorphism from that group into the larger one.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).