For a stationary chain, is controlled by the -step total variation distance
ProvedMarkovChainCLT.phiMixingCoef_le_of_tvDist_leLet be a Markov kernel with invariant probability , and run the chain from so that it is stationary. If the -step transition kernel is uniformly close to in total variation,
then the uniform (-) mixing coefficient at lag satisfies .
Why this is the whole Markov-property content. By definition is a supremum over pairs with in the past and in the future . The Markov property collapses this to a statement about two plain sets: conditioning on the whole past reduces to conditioning on the current state , so where takes values in , and stationarity gives . Hence
the last step because and the norm is the normalization. This is exactly the two-set formula for that the Markov chain literature uses in place of the general definition (see e.g. Geyer's Stat 8112 notes, eq. (34)).
Stated with an explicit uniform bound rather than a supremum, so that it composes directly: under uniform ergodicity one takes and reads off , which is the quantitative half of Theorem 2(iv) and the hypothesis Corollary 5 consumes.
import Definitions.Def_MarkovErgodicity import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainPathMeasure import Definitions.Def_MixingCoefficients open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Filter open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology ProbabilityTheory
theorem MarkovChainCLT.phiMixingCoef_le_of_tvDist_le {X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X]
(P : Kernel X X) [IsMarkovKernel P] (π : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure π]
(hinv : Kernel.Invariant P π) (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (C : ℝ) (hC0 : 0 ≤ C)
(hC : ∀ x, tvDist ((iterKernel P n) x) π ≤ C) :
phiMixingCoef (chainMeasure P π) (fun i (ω : ℕ → X) => ω i) n ≤ C := by sorry