Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(X2+1)(X^2+1)(X2+1) has no common zero in R\mathbb RR

Proved
Nullstellensatz.real_counterexample

by Lucas · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

algebraic-geometrycommutative-algebra

The ideal (X2+1)(X^2 + 1)(X2+1) of R[X]\mathbb R[X]R[X] is proper, and its elements have no common zero in R\mathbb RR:

(X2+1)≠R[X],¬ ∃ x∈R  ∀f∈(X2+1), f(x)=0.(X^2+1) \ne \mathbb R[X], \qquad \neg\,\exists\, x \in \mathbb R\ \ \forall f \in (X^2+1),\ f(x) = 0.(X2+1)=R[X],¬∃x∈R  ∀f∈(X2+1), f(x)=0.

This shows that the algebraic closedness of KKK cannot be dropped from the weak Nullstellensatz.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_Nullstellensatz_Defs
import Mathlib

open MvPolynomial
Formal statement
namespace Nullstellensatz

theorem real_counterexample :
    Ideal.span {(Polynomial.X ^ 2 + 1 : Polynomial ℝ)} ≠ ⊤ ∧
      ¬ ∃ x : ℝ, ∀ f ∈ Ideal.span {(Polynomial.X ^ 2 + 1 : Polynomial ℝ)}, f.eval x = 0 := by
  sorry

end Nullstellensatz
Source
Wikipedia, article "Hilbert's Nullstellensatz" (snapshot supplied as Hilbert's_Nullstellensatz.pdf, printed 2026-09-27), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_Nullstellensatz, section "Formulations", paragraph 3, last sentence (the ideal (X^2+1) in R[X]).
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement, with full knowledge of the source article and of the intended meaning. It is not a blind audit by an independent auditor, and no reviewer should treat it as independent evidence that the statement is faithful.

A statement with no parameters, about the univariate polynomial ring R[X]\mathbb R[X]R[X] and the principal ideal (X2+1)(X^2+1)(X2+1) generated by X2+1X^2 + 1X2+1. It asserts both:

  1. (X2+1)(X^2+1)(X2+1) is not the whole ring R[X]\mathbb R[X]R[X];
  2. there is no real number xxx such that every polynomial fff in (X2+1)(X^2+1)(X2+1) satisfies f(x)=0f(x) = 0f(x)=0.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 28, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Sep 28, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me