Ordinary base-stock average loss is bounded by a demand scan
ProvedCappedBaseStock.base_stock_average_loss_scancapped-base-stockinventorylost-salesoperations-research
Consider the zero-start lost-sales inventory model with i.i.d. nonnegative demand of finite positive mean, integer lead time , and positive holding and penalty rates. For any ordinary base-stock level , let be its lost sales and let
Then the upper limit of expected average lost sales satisfies
The trajectory starts with zero on-hand inventory and an empty pipeline. This is a bound on its long-run average, with no assumption that it starts in stationarity. In particular, the statement does not assert this bound for every individual transient period. It connects the policy dynamics to a demand-only scan and can be reused at any stock level.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_CappedBaseStock_BaseStockAnalysis open MeasureTheory open scoped ENNReal NNReal
Formal statement
namespace CappedBaseStock
theorem base_stock_average_loss_scan (P : DemandLaw) (c : Parameters) (S : ℝ≥0) :
baseStockAverageLoss P c S ≤
(∫⁻ d, scanExcess d c.L (S : ℝ) ∂demandPathLaw P) /
((c.L : ℝ≥0∞) + 1) := by sorry
end CappedBaseStock
Source
Linwei Xin, Capped Base-Stock Policies: A 2.33-Approximation, author-supplied LaTeX manuscript (756 lines), SHA-256 f353793c255e1ebed5f3ec541037284bd926183e3e5b71941f13e79c2d67cb7a. Public paper listing: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7134538. Lemma `lem-base-stock-loss`, equations `eq-loss-recursion` and `eq-scan-bound`, lines 536–550 and 556–582, with the greedy-window lemma at lines 502–523. This is the zero-start Cesaro-average counterpart of the stationary scan inequality; finite initial and incomplete blocks must be accounted for, not assumed away.