Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§13 (C), Corollary IV₂ — F1⊂FF_1\subset FF1​⊂F iff K1≪MKK_1 \ll MKK1​≪MK for some M>0M>0M>0

Proved
AronszajnRK.Inclusion.subclass_iff_kernel_dominated

by mikedeng1 · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

p2o-batch-pfp1bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1reproducing-kernelsrkhs

Let KKK and K1K_1K1​ be positive matrices on a set XXX, and let FFF and F1F_1F1​ be the corresponding classes of complex functions (the Hilbert spaces with reproducing kernels KKK and K1K_1K1​). Then

F1⊂F  ⟺  there is a constant M>0 with K1≪MK.F_1\subset F \iff \text{there is a constant } M>0 \text{ with } K_1 \ll MK .F1​⊂F⟺there is a constant M>0 with K1​≪MK.

This turns the inclusion of two function spaces into an inequality between their kernels, which can be checked on finite point sets.

Formalization Note By Moore's theorem (§2 (4)) each positive matrix corresponds to exactly one class, so the statement is given for arbitrary complex RKHS instances HHH, H1H_1H1​ with KKK, K1K_1K1​ their scalar kernels; "F1⊂FF_1\subset FF1​⊂F" is inclusion of their sets of functions. MMM is a positive real number multiplying the complex kernel KKK.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AronszajnRK_Sum_kernelFn
import Definitions.Def_AronszajnRK_Limits_KernelLE
Formal statement
namespace AronszajnRK.Inclusion

/-- Aronszajn, *Theory of Reproducing Kernels*, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), §13 (C),
Corollary IV₂, p. 383 (PDF p. 47). Let `K` and `K₁` be two positive matrices, `F` and `F₁` the
corresponding classes. In order that `F₁ ⊂ F` it is necessary and sufficient that there exists a
positive constant `M` such that `K₁ ≪ MK`.

By Moore's theorem (§2 (4), p. 344) the class corresponding to a positive matrix is the unique RKHS
with that kernel, so the statement is given for arbitrary complex RKHSs `H`, `H₁` on `X` with
`K := AronszajnRK.Sum.kernelFn H`, `K₁ := AronszajnRK.Sum.kernelFn H₁`. -/
theorem subclass_iff_kernel_dominated {X H H₁ : Type*}
    [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace ℂ H] [CompleteSpace H] [RKHS ℂ H X ℂ]
    [NormedAddCommGroup H₁] [InnerProductSpace ℂ H₁] [CompleteSpace H₁] [RKHS ℂ H₁ X ℂ] :
    Set.range (fun f₁ : H₁ => ⇑f₁) ⊆ Set.range (fun f : H => ⇑f) ↔
      ∃ M : ℝ, 0 < M ∧ AronszajnRK.Limits.KernelLE (AronszajnRK.Sum.kernelFn H₁) (fun x y => (M : ℂ) * AronszajnRK.Sum.kernelFn H x y) := by sorry

end AronszajnRK.Inclusion
Source
Aronszajn, Theory of Reproducing Kernels, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), p. 383, §13 (C), Corollary IV₂
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me