§13 (C), Corollary IV₁ — two RKHS norms on the same class are equivalent
ProvedAronszajnRK.Inclusion.equivalent_norms_same_classp2o-batch-pfp1bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1reproducing-kernelsrkhs
Let and be two norms each giving the same (R.K.)-class of complex functions on the structure of a Hilbert space with a reproducing kernel. Then there are constants and such that
In particular, the Hilbert-space topology of an (R.K.)-class does not depend on the choice of admissible norm.
Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace AronszajnRK.Inclusion
/-- Aronszajn, *Theory of Reproducing Kernels*, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), §13 (C),
Corollary IV₁, p. 383 (PDF p. 47). Let `‖ ‖` and `‖ ‖₁` be two norms corresponding to the same
(R.K.)-class `F`. There exist two positive constants `m` and `M` such that
`m‖f‖ ≤ ‖f‖₁ ≤ M‖f‖` for `f ∈ F`. The two norms are those of RKHSs `H` and `H₁` with the same
class of functions. -/
theorem equivalent_norms_same_class {X H H₁ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace ℂ H] [CompleteSpace H] [RKHS ℂ H X ℂ]
[NormedAddCommGroup H₁] [InnerProductSpace ℂ H₁] [CompleteSpace H₁] [RKHS ℂ H₁ X ℂ]
(heq : Set.range (fun f₁ : H₁ => ⇑f₁) = Set.range (fun f : H => ⇑f)) :
∃ m M : ℝ, 0 < m ∧ 0 < M ∧
∀ (f : H) (f₁ : H₁), ⇑f = ⇑f₁ → m * ‖f‖ ≤ ‖f₁‖ ∧ ‖f₁‖ ≤ M * ‖f‖ := by sorry
end AronszajnRK.Inclusion
Source
Aronszajn, Theory of Reproducing Kernels, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), p. 383, §13 (C), Corollary IV₁
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.