Size of the Dris index:
ProvedOddPerfectNumber.dris_index_ge_pow_thirteennumber-theory
Consider the Dris parametrisation of the Euler equation: prime, odd with , and
so that is the Dris index of the hypothetical odd perfect number . Then
where is the number of distinct prime divisors of (natural subtraction, so the statement is vacuous when ).
The reason is that factors as the product of the local divisor sums over the primes , and this product equals . At most of these local sums can be divisible by ; each of the remaining ones is a divisor of exceeding , and in fact each is at least because is an odd prime. Multiplying at least such factors, all dividing the odd number , gives the stated bound. Combined with Sylvester's bound (hence ) this is informative at small special exponents; at it yields .
Preamble
import Mathlib open Finset
Formal statement
namespace OddPerfectNumber
theorem dris_index_ge_pow_thirteen (p k m s : Nat) (hp : p.Prime) (hm : Odd m) (hpm : ¬ p ∣ m)
(h1 : 2 * m ^ 2 = (∑ d ∈ (p ^ k).divisors, d) * s)
(h2 : (∑ x ∈ (m ^ 2).divisors, x) = p ^ k * s) :
13 ^ (m.primeFactors.card - k) ≤ s := by
sorry
end OddPerfectNumberSource
J. A. B. Dris, The abundancy index of divisors of odd perfect numbers, Journal of Integer Sequences 15 (2012), Article 12.4.4, Section 2 (Dris parametrisation); the counting argument is the one behind OddPerfectNumber.dris_prime_support_bound.