Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Operator-valued scattering for the one-dimensional wave equation with memory

Disproved
ScatteringMain.operatorValuedScattering

by ShouqiaoWang · Aug 26, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fourier-analysisharmonic-analysisoperator-theorypartial-differential-equationsscattering-theorywave-equations

⚠️ Retired — specification defect

The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its Disproved status carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.

Let a medium MMM consist of positive real numbers RRR, TTT, and γ\gammaγ, and a function a:Rx×Rt→Ca:\mathbb R_x\times\mathbb R_t\to\mathbb Ca:Rx​×Rt​→C with the following properties: a(x,t)=0a(x,t)=0a(x,t)=0 whenever ∣x∣>R|x|>R∣x∣>R or ∣t∣>T|t|>T∣t∣>T; for every ttt, the map x↦a(x,t)x\mapsto a(x,t)x↦a(x,t) is strongly measurable; for every xxx, the map t↦a(x,t)t\mapsto a(x,t)t↦a(x,t) is smooth; and for every derivative order kkk there is a finite nonnegative bound, independent of xxx and ttt, for ∣∂tka(x,t)∣|\partial_t^ka(x,t)|∣∂tk​a(x,t)∣.

Put C+={z:Im⁡z>0}\mathbb C_+=\{z:\operatorname{Im}z>0\}C+​={z:Imz>0}. Represent a scalar frequency signal by a function f:C→Cf:\mathbb C\to\mathbb Cf:C→C that vanishes outside C+\mathbb C_+C+​. For α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb Rα∈R, define

Eα(h)=sup⁡σ>0e−2σα∫R∣h(λ+iσ)∣2 dλ,E_\alpha(h)=\sup_{\sigma>0}e^{-2\sigma\alpha} \int_{\mathbb R}|h(\lambda+i\sigma)|^2\,d\lambda,Eα​(h)=σ>0sup​e−2σα∫R​∣h(λ+iσ)∣2dλ,

and let Hα\mathcal H_\alphaHα​ be the holomorphic signals with Eα(h)<∞E_\alpha(h)<\inftyEα​(h)<∞. Say that f∈(z+i)−1Hαf\in(z+i)^{-1}\mathcal H_\alphaf∈(z+i)−1Hα​ when (z+i)f(z)∈Hα(z+i)f(z)\in\mathcal H_\alpha(z+i)f(z)∈Hα​, and that h∈z−1Hβh\in z^{-1}\mathcal H_\betah∈z−1Hβ​ when zh(z)∈Hβzh(z)\in\mathcal H_\betazh(z)∈Hβ​.

For every real R1>RR_1>RR1​>R, there exist complex-linear maps T,R+T,R_+T,R+​ on frequency signals and complex-linear maps T,R+\mathcal T,\mathcal R_+T,R+​ on time signals, all chosen before α\alphaα, with the following properties.

  1. For each L∈{T,R+}L\in\{T,R_+\}L∈{T,R+​} and each α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb Rα∈R, there is a finite constant CL,α≥0C_{L,\alpha}\ge0CL,α​≥0 such that every f∈(z+i)−1Hαf\in(z+i)^{-1}\mathcal H_\alphaf∈(z+i)−1Hα​ satisfies Lf∈z−1Hα+2R1Lf\in z^{-1}\mathcal H_{\alpha+2R_1}Lf∈z−1Hα+2R1​​ and
Eα+2R1(zLf)≤CL,αEα((z+i)f).E_{\alpha+2R_1}(zLf)\le C_{L,\alpha}E_\alpha((z+i)f).Eα+2R1​​(zLf)≤CL,α​Eα​((z+i)f).
  1. For each such α\alphaα and fff, there exists a frequency field v(x,z)v(x,z)v(x,z), holomorphic in z∈C+z\in\mathbb C_+z∈C+​ and locally in z−1Hβz^{-1}\mathcal H_\betaz−1Hβ​ in xxx for some weight β\betaβ, that solves weakly
(Dx2−z2+AM(x))v=0,(AM(x)v)(z)=12π∫Ra^(x,zre−λ)λ+iIm⁡zλ+iIm⁡z+iγv(x,λ+iIm⁡z) dλ,\left(D_x^2-z^2+A_M(x)\right)v=0, \qquad (A_M(x)v)(z)=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R} \widehat a(x,z_{\mathrm{re}}-\lambda) \frac{\lambda+i\operatorname{Im}z}{\lambda+i\operatorname{Im}z+i\gamma} v(x,\lambda+i\operatorname{Im}z)\,d\lambda,(Dx2​−z2+AM​(x))v=0,(AM​(x)v)(z)=2π1​∫R​a(x,zre​−λ)λ+iImz+iγλ+iImz​v(x,λ+iImz)dλ,

where Dx=−i∂xD_x=-i\partial_xDx​=−i∂x​ and a^(x,ν)=∫eiνta(x,t) dt\widehat a(x,\nu)=\int e^{i\nu t}a(x,t)\,dta(x,ν)=∫eiνta(x,t)dt. The convolution is absolutely Bochner integrable on every upper-half-plane slice, and

v(x,z)={f(z)eizx+(R+f)(z)e−izx,x<−R,(Tf)(z)eizx,x>R.v(x,z)= \begin{cases} f(z)e^{izx}+(R_+f)(z)e^{-izx},&x<-R,\\ (Tf)(z)e^{izx},&x>R. \end{cases}v(x,z)={f(z)eizx+(R+​f)(z)e−izx,(Tf)(z)eizx,​x<−R,x>R.​

Any other weak frequency field satisfying the same equation and exterior identities agrees with vvv almost everywhere in xxx for every z∈C+z\in\mathbb C_+z∈C+​.

  1. A time datum g:R→Cg:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Cg:R→C is admissible when it is smooth, compactly supported with topological support contained in (R,∞)(R,\infty)(R,∞), and its Fourier–Laplace integral g^(z)=∫Reiztg(t) dt\widehat g(z)=\int_{\mathbb R}e^{izt}g(t)\,dtg​(z)=∫R​eiztg(t)dt is absolutely integrable for every z∈C+z\in\mathbb C_+z∈C+​. For every admissible ggg, both Tg\mathcal TgTg and R+g\mathcal R_+gR+​g have such transforms and
Tg^(z)=T(g^)(z),R+g^(z)=R+(g^)(z)(z∈C+).\widehat{\mathcal Tg}(z)=T(\widehat g)(z),\qquad \widehat{\mathcal R_+g}(z)=R_+(\widehat g)(z) \quad(z\in\mathbb C_+).Tg​(z)=T(g​)(z),R+​g​(z)=R+​(g​)(z)(z∈C+​).
  1. For every admissible ggg, there is an energy field uuu with value in CtHx1C_tH_x^1Ct​Hx1​, time derivative in CtLx2C_tL_x^2Ct​Lx2​, and named weak time and space derivatives, satisfying the causal memory equation
Dt2u−a(x,t)∫−∞te−γ(t−s)Dtu(s,x) ds−Dx2u=0D_t^2u-a(x,t)\int_{-\infty}^{t}e^{-\gamma(t-s)}D_tu(s,x)\,ds-D_x^2u=0Dt2​u−a(x,t)∫−∞t​e−γ(t−s)Dt​u(s,x)ds−Dx2​u=0

in the weak spacetime sense, with u(t,x)=g(t−x)u(t,x)=g(t-x)u(t,x)=g(t−x) for every t<0t<0t<0. It has the exterior representation

u(t,x)={g(t−x)+(R+g)(t+x),x<−R,(Tg)(t−x),x>R,u(t,x)= \begin{cases} g(t-x)+(\mathcal R_+g)(t+x),&x<-R,\\ (\mathcal Tg)(t-x),&x>R, \end{cases}u(t,x)={g(t−x)+(R+​g)(t+x),(Tg)(t−x),​x<−R,x>R,​

for all ttt, and it is unique among causal energy solutions modulo almost-everywhere equality of the value and both weak derivatives on every time slice.

The statement identifies a single frequency scattering pair and its time-domain realization, simultaneously for every Hardy weight and every exterior cutoff R1>RR_1>RR1​>R.

Formalization Note The total integral operators are always accompanied by explicit measurability and integrability conditions. Frequency functions use canonical zero extension away from C+\mathbb C_+C+​, and Sobolev solutions are compared by their natural almost-everywhere equivalence rather than by arbitrary pointwise representatives.

Why this node was retired

The posted statement is

noncomputable section

namespace ScatteringMain

open ScatteringInterfaces

theorem operatorValuedScattering (M : Medium) :
    OperatorValuedScatteringProblem M := by sorry

end ScatteringMain

FrequencyLocal requires one exponential Hardy weight β to control every spatial radius ρ, incompatible with the prescribed incoming wave even in the free medium.

The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.

Proposed corrected statement

Replace ∃β ∀ρ>0 by ∀ρ>0 ∃β(ρ) in the local weighted Hardy condition, retaining a finite bound for that fixed spatial window. Recheck all downstream mapping and scattering conclusions against the original source.

Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_frame_2026_scattering_interfaces
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace ScatteringMain

open ScatteringInterfaces

theorem operatorValuedScattering (M : Medium) :
    OperatorValuedScatteringProblem M := by sorry

end ScatteringMain
Source
Jeffrey Galkowski and Maciej Zworski, 1D Scattering Through Time Dependent Media with Memory (with an appendix by Zhen Huang and Maciej Zworski), Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 58 (2027), 111–135, Theorems 1.1–1.2 and equations (1.1)–(1.7), journal pp. 111–113: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2026144

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me