Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Local conjugacy of pronilpotent supplements

Proved
LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.theorem_1_1

by burkh4rt · Sep 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

group-theorylocal-conjugacylocal-conjugacy-prosolvableprofinite-groups

Let GGG be profinite, let N⊴GN\trianglelefteq GN⊴G be closed and pronilpotent, and let H,K≤GH,K\le GH,K≤G be closed subgroups satisfying G=NH=NKG=NH=NKG=NH=NK. Assume either that GGG is prosupersolvable or that G/NG/NG/N is pronilpotent. Then

H and K are conjugate in G⟺H and K are locally conjugate in G.H\text{ and }K\text{ are conjugate in }G\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad H\text{ and }K\text{ are locally conjugate in }G.H and K are conjugate in G⟺H and K are locally conjugate in G.

Here local conjugacy means that for every prime ppp, a Sylow pro-ppp subgroup of HHH and a Sylow pro-ppp subgroup of KKK are conjugate in GGG. No trivial-intersection condition on N∩HN\cap HN∩H or N∩KN\cap KN∩K is imposed.

This is the project's local-to-global conjugacy theorem for supplements of a pronilpotent normal subgroup.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Groups
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Cohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Examples
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Definitions
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Bridges
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Counterexamples_Heisenberg
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Counterexamples_HeisenbergStructure
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Counterexamples_HeisenbergSupersolvable
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_ConcreteGroups
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Targets
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Compactness
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_ProfiniteSylow
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_StructuralImages
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_FiniteAbelianCohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_AbelianComplement
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_QuotientReduction
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Cohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_InvariantRestriction
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleActions
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CoprimeCohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleDescent
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleZorn
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleProducts
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_FiniteCoefficientSubgroup
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleInvarianceSubgroup
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleInjectivity
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_CocycleRebase
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_FiniteHall
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_SupersolvableStructure
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_ProfiniteHall
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_ActionProductTopology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_HallCohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_SupersolvableRestriction
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_NilpotentCoefficients
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_NonabelianComplement
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_ComplementSupersolvable
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_Counterexamples_Quaternion
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_QuaternionCohomology
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_QuaternionMatrices
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_QuaternionAction
import Definitions.Def_LocalConjugacy_Proof_QuaternionComplements

universe u_1

Formal statement
theorem LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.theorem_1_1 :
∀ {G : Type u_1} [inst : Group.{u_1} G] [inst_1 : TopologicalSpace.{u_1} G]
  [@LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Profinite.{u_1} G inst inst_1] (N H K : @Subgroup.{u_1} G inst)
  [inst_3 : @Subgroup.Normal.{u_1} G inst N]
  (hN :
    @IsClosed.{u_1} G inst_1
      (@SetLike.coe.{u_1, u_1} (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst) G (@Subgroup.instSetLike.{u_1} G inst) N))
  (hH :
    @IsClosed.{u_1} G inst_1
      (@SetLike.coe.{u_1, u_1} (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst) G (@Subgroup.instSetLike.{u_1} G inst) H))
  (hK :
    @IsClosed.{u_1} G inst_1
      (@SetLike.coe.{u_1, u_1} (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst) G (@Subgroup.instSetLike.{u_1} G inst) K))
  (hpron :
    @LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Pronilpotent.{u_1}
      (@Subtype.{u_1 + 1} G fun (x : G) =>
        @Membership.mem.{u_1, u_1} G (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst)
          (@SetLike.instMembership.{u_1, u_1} (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst) G (@Subgroup.instSetLike.{u_1} G inst)) N x)
      (@Subgroup.toGroup.{u_1} G inst N)
      (@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype.{u_1} G
        (fun (x : G) =>
          @Membership.mem.{u_1, u_1} G (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst)
            (@SetLike.instMembership.{u_1, u_1} (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst) G (@Subgroup.instSetLike.{u_1} G inst)) N x)
        inst_1))
  (hcase :
    Or (@LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Prosupersolvable.{u_1} G inst inst_1)
      (@LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Pronilpotent.{u_1}
        (@HasQuotient.Quotient.{u_1, u_1} G (@Subgroup.{u_1} G inst)
          (@QuotientGroup.instHasQuotientSubgroup.{u_1} G inst) N)
        (@QuotientGroup.Quotient.group.{u_1} G inst N inst_3)
        (@QuotientGroup.instTopologicalSpace.{u_1} G inst_1 inst N)))
  (hHN : @LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Supplements.{u_1} G inst N H)
  (hKN : @LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Supplements.{u_1} G inst N K),
  Iff (@LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.Conjugate.{u_1} G inst H K)
    (@LocalConjugacy.Proof.LocalConjugacy.LocallyConjugate.{u_1} G inst inst_1 H K) := by sorry
Source
Michael C. Burkhart, Local conjugacy in prosolvable groups, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37678; supporting formalization lemma, LocalConjugacy/NormalIntersectionCompactness.lean, lines 84–108; source SHA-256 68b5478cd18e7a5843a6fdb9d6f7769e11034c75d256076dc80570e53a4f583e.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me