Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Equation (8) — multiple-choice selection probabilities in terms of binary odds

Proved
McFadden1974.IIA.prob_eq_inv_sum_odds

by mikedeng1 · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conditional-logitdiscrete-choiceluce-choice-axiomp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Assume the standing conditions and Axioms 1 and 2, and write pxy=P(x∣s,{x,y})p_{xy} = P(x\mid s,\{x,y\})pxy​=P(x∣s,{x,y}) for x≠yx\neq yx=y, pxx=12p_{xx}=\tfrac12pxx​=21​. For every possible alternative set BBB and x∈Bx\in Bx∈B,

P(x∣s,B)=1∑y∈Bpyx/pxy.P(x\mid s,B) = \frac{1}{\sum_{y\in B} p_{yx}/p_{xy}}.P(x∣s,B)=∑y∈B​pyx​/pxy​1​.

Under Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and positivity, the multiple choice selection probabilities are determined by the binary choice probabilities.

Formalization Note All binary probabilities involved are positive by Axiom 2 on the possible two-element sets, so the divisions are genuine.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_McFadden1974_IIA_ChoiceModel
Formal statement
namespace McFadden1974.IIA

/-- **Equation (8)** (p. 110, PDF p. 6): "Hence, the multiple choice selection probabilities can
be written in terms of binary odds,
(8) P(x | s, B) = 1 / Σ_{y∈B} (p_yx/p_xy)."

Formalization Note: standing assumptions `IsSelectionProb` and `PairsPossible`, and Axioms 1
and 2. Every `p_yx`, `p_xy` with `x, y ∈ B` is positive (Axiom 2 on the possible set
`{x, y}`, or `½` on the diagonal), so the divisions are genuine and the denominator is at least
`p_xx/p_xx = 1`. -/
theorem prob_eq_inv_sum_odds {X S : Type*} [DecidableEq X]
    (P : S → Finset X → X → ℝ) (poss : Set (Finset X))
    (hprob : IsSelectionProb P poss) (hpairs : PairsPossible poss)
    (hA1 : Axiom1 P poss) (hA2 : Axiom2 P poss)
    (s : S) (B : Finset X) (hB : B ∈ poss) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ B) :
    P s B x = 1 / ∑ y ∈ B, binProb P s y x / binProb P s x y := by sorry

end McFadden1974.IIA
Source
McFadden, Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press (1974), p. 110, Equation (8) (PDF p. 6)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me