Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Continuous dynamics on the antipodal quotient

Proved
BirkhoffGlobalSection.antipodal_quotient_dynamics_continuous

by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

celestial-mechanicsdynamical-systemshamiltonian-dynamics

Let the selected Levi-Civita component be invariant under its free antipodal deck map, and let a continuous real flow commute with that map. Then the representative-independent time maps induced on

Qμ,c=Σμ,c/(s∼−s)Q_{\mu,c}=\Sigma_{\mu,c}/(s\sim -s)Qμ,c​=Σμ,c​/(s∼−s)

form a jointly continuous map R×Qμ,c→Qμ,c\mathbb{R}\times Q_{\mu,c}\to Q_{\mu,c}R×Qμ,c​→Qμ,c​. Its identity and composition laws are inherited from the original Flow.

This is the topological descent needed before return conditions can be interpreted as statements about a genuine quotient flow rather than unrelated time maps.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffGlobalSection
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffGlobalSection

/-- A continuous antipodally equivariant flow descends to a jointly continuous
real action on the free invariant antipodal quotient. -/
theorem antipodal_quotient_dynamics_continuous {μ c : ℝ}
    (φ : Flow ℝ (LeftEnergyState μ c))
    (hanti : IsAntipodallyEquivariantFlow μ c φ)
    (hinv : IsAntipodallyInvariantComponent μ c)
    (hfree : IsAntipodallyFreeComponent μ c) :
    IsContinuousQuotientDynamics φ hanti := by sorry

end BirkhoffGlobalSection
Source
Formal covering-space consequence of the antipodal equivariance in Joung--van Koert, equation (2.4) and Proposition 2.4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19159v3.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · OpenAI Codex

Read-back model: OpenAI Codex. File SHA-256: ef63da7682b4e422eb02184f71c7f1c06536a7d866faac3dca1dd0d75a470647. This declaration is an admitted by sorry goal, not a proved theorem. It universally quantifies over implicit real μ,cμ,cμ,c, a real flow φφφ on the subtype XXX of leftEnergyComponent μ,cμ,cμ,c, a proof that for every real ttt every existing pair s2=−s1s_2=-s_1s2​=−s1​ satisfies φt(s2)=−φt(s1)φ_t(s_2)=-φ_t(s_1)φt​(s2​)=−φt​(s1​), a proof that every ambient sss belongs to the component exactly when −s-s−s does, and a proof that no state in XXX equals its own negative. Let QQQ be the quotient of XXX by s∼s′s∼s's∼s′ when s=s′s=s's=s′ or s=−s′s=-s's=−s′, and let φˉt([s])=[φt(s)]\bar φ_t([s])=[φ_t(s)]φˉ​t​([s])=[φt​(s)], whose well-definedness uses the equivariance hypothesis. The conclusion says that (t,x)↦φˉt(x)(t,x)↦\bar φ_t(x)(t,x)↦φˉ​t​(x) is jointly continuous, φˉ0(x)=x\bar φ_0(x)=xφˉ​0​(x)=x for every x∈Qx∈Qx∈Q, and φˉt1+t2(x)=φˉt1(φˉt2(x))\bar φ_{t_1+t_2}(x)=\bar φ_{t_1}(\bar φ_{t_2}(x))φˉ​t1​+t2​​(x)=φˉ​t1​​(φˉ​t2​​(x)) for every real t1,t2t_1,t_2t1​,t2​ and x∈Qx∈Qx∈Q. It asserts no Hamiltonian generator, nonemptiness, quotient-manifold identification, orbit, or page; on an empty XXX, the statewise clauses are vacuous.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 12, 2026

  • Endorsed by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me