Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Flow matching: marginal density, flux, and classical regularity

Definition
FlowMatchingT1

by MiltMont · Sep 23, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

analysiscontinuity-equationflow-matchingmeasure-theory

Let E=RdE=\mathbb R^dE=Rd, represented as a finite product of real lines. For a measure QQQ on conditioning points, a conditional density ρ(t,x,z)\rho(t,x,z)ρ(t,x,z), and a conditional velocity v(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)v(t,x,z), define

F(t,x,z)=ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z),p(t,x)=∫ρ(t,x,z) dQ(z),J(t,x)=∫F(t,x,z) dQ(z),u(t,x)=p(t,x)−1J(t,x).F(t,x,z)=\rho(t,x,z)v(t,x,z),\quad p(t,x)=\int\rho(t,x,z)\,dQ(z),\quad J(t,x)=\int F(t,x,z)\,dQ(z),\quad u(t,x)=p(t,x)^{-1}J(t,x).F(t,x,z)=ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z),p(t,x)=∫ρ(t,x,z)dQ(z),J(t,x)=∫F(t,x,z)dQ(z),u(t,x)=p(t,x)−1J(t,x).

Divergence is the sum of diagonal derivative coordinates. A probability density is a pointwise nonnegative, Lebesgue-integrable real function with integral one. The classical continuity-equation predicate requires spatial differentiability of the flux and time derivative −div⁡(pu)-\operatorname{div}(pu)−div(pu) at every spatial point and every 0<t<10<t<10<t<1.

The time and space regularity predicates each require integrability at the base point, local almost-everywhere strong measurability of integrands, almost-everywhere strong measurability of derivatives at the base point, and a common neighborhood on which almost every conditional function is differentiable with derivative norm bounded by one integrable function of zzz. The derivative in time is scalar; the spatial derivative is a continuous linear map.

The density hypotheses require strict positivity, joint measurability in (x,z)(x,z)(x,z), normalization in xxx for every zzz, and integrability in zzz for every xxx, at every t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1]. Analytic hypotheses require time regularity of the density and spatial regularity of the conditional flux at interior times. Neither bundle assumes a marginal continuity equation or an interchange identity. A probability-measure assumption on QQQ is supplied separately in the theorems that need it.

Formalization Note. These are definitions and explicit sufficient analytic hypotheses. They impose no ODE-flow interpretation, and are defined for d=0d=0d=0 as well as positive dimensions. The definitions alone do not assert that the displayed integrals exist or that the denominator is positive; theorem hypotheses and conclusions supply those guarantees on their stated domains.

Definition code
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar

open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology

namespace FlowMatchingT1

abbrev Space (d : ℕ) := Fin d → ℝ

noncomputable def divergence {d : ℕ} (f : Space d → Space d) (x : Space d) : ℝ :=
  ∑ i, (fderiv ℝ f x (Pi.single i 1)) i

noncomputable def conditionalFlux {d : ℕ}
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) (v : ℝ → Space d → Space d → Space d)
    (t : ℝ) (x z : Space d) : Space d := ρ t x z • v t x z

noncomputable def marginalDensity {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) (t : ℝ) (x : Space d) : ℝ :=
  ∫ z, ρ t x z ∂Q

noncomputable def marginalFlux {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) (v : ℝ → Space d → Space d → Space d)
    (t : ℝ) (x : Space d) : Space d := ∫ z, conditionalFlux ρ v t x z ∂Q

noncomputable def marginalVelocity {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) (v : ℝ → Space d → Space d → Space d)
    (t : ℝ) (x : Space d) : Space d :=
  (marginalDensity Q ρ t x)⁻¹ • marginalFlux Q ρ v t x

def ProbabilityDensity {d : ℕ} (p : Space d → ℝ) : Prop :=
  (∀ x, 0 ≤ p x) ∧ Integrable p volume ∧ (∫ x, p x) = 1

def ContinuityEquation {d : ℕ} (p : ℝ → Space d → ℝ)
    (u : ℝ → Space d → Space d) : Prop :=
  ∀ t ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ x,
    DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => p t y • u t y) x ∧
    HasDerivAt (fun s => p s x) (-divergence (fun y => p t y • u t y) x) t

def TimeRegularAt {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (f : ℝ → Space d → ℝ) (t : ℝ) : Prop :=
  Integrable (f t) Q ∧
  (∀ᶠ s in 𝓝 t, AEStronglyMeasurable (f s) Q) ∧
  AEStronglyMeasurable (fun z => deriv (fun s => f s z) t) Q ∧
  ∃ N ∈ 𝓝 t, ∃ b : Space d → ℝ, Integrable b Q ∧
    (∀ᵐ z ∂Q, ∀ s ∈ N, ‖deriv (fun r => f r z) s‖ ≤ b z) ∧
    (∀ᵐ z ∂Q, ∀ s ∈ N, DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun r => f r z) s)

def SpaceRegularAt {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (F : Space d → Space d → Space d) (x : Space d) : Prop :=
  Integrable (F x) Q ∧
  (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F y) Q) ∧
  AEStronglyMeasurable (fun z => fderiv ℝ (fun y => F y z) x) Q ∧
  ∃ N ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ b : Space d → ℝ, Integrable b Q ∧
    (∀ᵐ z ∂Q, ∀ y ∈ N, ‖fderiv ℝ (fun w => F w z) y‖ ≤ b z) ∧
    (∀ᵐ z ∂Q, ∀ y ∈ N, DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun w => F w z) y)

structure DensityHypotheses {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) : Prop where
  positive : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ x z, 0 < ρ t x z
  measurable : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, Measurable (fun p : Space d × Space d => ρ t p.1 p.2)
  normalized : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ z, ProbabilityDensity (fun x => ρ t x z)
  integrable : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ x, Integrable (fun z => ρ t x z) Q

structure AnalyticHypotheses {d : ℕ} (Q : Measure (Space d))
    (ρ : ℝ → Space d → Space d → ℝ) (v : ℝ → Space d → Space d → Space d) : Prop where
  time_regular : ∀ t ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ x, TimeRegularAt Q (fun s z => ρ s x z) t
  space_regular : ∀ t ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ x, SpaceRegularAt Q (conditionalFlux ρ v t) x

end FlowMatchingT1
Source
Y. Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, M. Le, Flow Matching for Generative Modeling, ICLR 2023; https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747v2; Section 2, Section 3.1, Theorem 1, equations (6), (8), (26), Appendix A proof of Theorem 1. Local domination predicates make the proof's Leibniz-rule qualification explicit.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6-astra

Space. For each natural number ddd, including d=0d=0d=0, Space⁡(d)\operatorname{Space}(d)Space(d) is the real vector space of functions from {0,…,d−1}\{0,\ldots,d-1\}{0,…,d−1} to R\mathbb RR, with coordinatewise operations and its usual finite-product topology and measurable structure. Its norm is the maximum of the absolute values of its coordinates, with norm zero in dimension zero. For d=0d=0d=0 this space has exactly one element, the empty function.

divergence. For any natural number ddd, any function f:Rd→Rdf:\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^df:Rd→Rd, and any x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, where Rd\mathbb R^dRd means the coordinate-function space with its maximum norm, define div⁡f(x)=∑i=0d−1(Df(x)[ei])i\operatorname{div}f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}(D f(x)[e_i])_idivf(x)=∑i=0d−1​(Df(x)[ei​])i​. Here eie_iei​ has coordinate 111 at iii and 000 elsewhere, and Df(x)D f(x)Df(x) is the real Fréchet derivative, interpreted as the zero continuous linear map when fff is not differentiable at xxx. No differentiability assumption is imposed by this definition. When d=0d=0d=0 the sum is empty and the divergence is zero.

conditionalFlux. For any natural number ddd, any functions ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R and v:R×Rd×Rd→Rdv:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^dv:R×Rd×Rd→Rd, any real ttt, and any x,z∈Rdx,z\in\mathbb R^dx,z∈Rd, define the conditional flux to be ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)\rho(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z), using ordinary real scalar multiplication of coordinate vectors. There are no assumptions on positivity, measurability, or regularity, and no restriction on ttt. Dimension zero is included, in which case the result is the unique vector.

marginalDensity. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on the standard Borel measurable space Rd\mathbb R^dRd, any function ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R, any real ttt, and any x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, define m(t,x)=∫Rdρ(t,x,z) dQ(z)m(t,x)=\int_{\mathbb R^d}\rho(t,x,z)\,dQ(z)m(t,x)=∫Rd​ρ(t,x,z)dQ(z). This is the real Bochner integral, whose value is defined to be zero when the integrand is not Bochner integrable. No finiteness or probability assumption on QQQ, or positivity, measurability, or integrability assumption on ρ\rhoρ, is part of the definition. Dimension zero is included.

marginalFlux. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on the standard Borel measurable space Rd\mathbb R^dRd, any functions ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R and v:R×Rd×Rd→Rdv:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^dv:R×Rd×Rd→Rd, any real ttt, and any x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, define J(t,x)=∫Rdρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z) dQ(z)J(t,x)=\int_{\mathbb R^d}\rho(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)\,dQ(z)J(t,x)=∫Rd​ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)dQ(z). The integral is the vector-valued Bochner integral, with zero vector as its value when the integrand is not Bochner integrable. No positivity, regularity, measurability, integrability, or probability assumptions are imposed. Dimension zero is included and gives the unique vector.

marginalVelocity. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on the standard Borel measurable space Rd\mathbb R^dRd, any functions ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R and v:R×Rd×Rd→Rdv:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^dv:R×Rd×Rd→Rd, any real ttt, and any x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, define u(t,x)=(∫ρ(t,x,z) dQ(z))−1(∫ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z) dQ(z))u(t,x)=\bigl(\int\rho(t,x,z)\,dQ(z)\bigr)^{-1}\bigl(\int\rho(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)\,dQ(z)\bigr)u(t,x)=(∫ρ(t,x,z)dQ(z))−1(∫ρ(t,x,z)v(t,x,z)dQ(z)). Both integrals are Bochner integrals, defined to be zero if their respective integrands are not integrable, and the real inverse of zero is defined to be zero. Consequently the resulting vector is zero whenever the scalar integral is zero, regardless of the vector integral. No assumption that the denominator is positive or nonzero, or that QQQ is a probability measure, is made. All real times and dimension zero are included.

ProbabilityDensity. For any natural number ddd and any function p:Rd→Rp:\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rp:Rd→R, this predicate means the conjunction of pointwise nonnegativity p(x)≥0p(x)\geq0p(x)≥0 for every xxx, Bochner integrability of ppp with respect to the canonical volume measure on the coordinate space Rd\mathbb R^dRd, and ∫Rdp(x) dx=1\int_{\mathbb R^d}p(x)\,dx=1∫Rd​p(x)dx=1. Canonical volume here is the product of the ddd copies of real Lebesgue measure. Nonnegativity is required everywhere, rather than merely almost everywhere. When d=0d=0d=0, volume is the unit mass on the unique point, so the predicate holds exactly when ppp at that point is 111.

ContinuityEquation. For any natural number ddd, any scalar function p:R×Rd→Rp:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rp:R×Rd→R, and any vector function u:R×Rd→Rdu:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^du:R×Rd→Rd, this predicate says that for every real ttt with 0<t<10<t<10<t<1 and every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, the function y↦p(t,y)u(t,y)y\mapsto p(t,y)u(t,y)y↦p(t,y)u(t,y) is real Fréchet differentiable at xxx, and the function s↦p(s,x)s\mapsto p(s,x)s↦p(s,x) has real derivative at ttt equal to −∑i=0d−1(D[y↦p(t,y)u(t,y)](x)[ei])i-\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}(D[y\mapsto p(t,y)u(t,y)](x)[e_i])_i−∑i=0d−1​(D[y↦p(t,y)u(t,y)](x)[ei​])i​, where eie_iei​ is the iiith coordinate unit vector. The derivative assertions concern the functions on their full ambient real vector spaces. There are no requirements at t=0t=0t=0, t=1t=1t=1, or times outside the open interval, and no positivity, normalization, integrability, or separate differentiability requirements on uuu or on the spatial dependence of ppp. For d=0d=0d=0, the spatial flux is the unique vector and the condition reduces to the real time derivative of ppp at the unique spatial point being zero at every 0<t<10<t<10<t<1.

TimeRegularAt. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on Rd\mathbb R^dRd, any function f:R×Rd→Rf:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rf:R×Rd→R, and any real ttt, this predicate means that z↦f(t,z)z\mapsto f(t,z)z↦f(t,z) is Bochner integrable with respect to QQQ; there exists a neighborhood of ttt on which every slice z↦f(s,z)z\mapsto f(s,z)z↦f(s,z) is almost everywhere strongly measurable with respect to QQQ; the function z↦∂sf(t,z)z\mapsto \partial_s f(t,z)z↦∂s​f(t,z) is almost everywhere strongly measurable with respect to QQQ; and there exist a set N⊆RN\subseteq\mathbb RN⊆R that contains an open neighborhood of ttt and a Bochner-integrable real function bbb on (Rd,Q)(\mathbb R^d,Q)(Rd,Q) such that, for QQQ-almost every zzz, ∣∂sf(s,z)∣≤b(z)|\partial_s f(s,z)|\leq b(z)∣∂s​f(s,z)∣≤b(z) for every s∈Ns\in Ns∈N, and, for QQQ-almost every zzz, the full real function r↦f(r,z)r\mapsto f(r,z)r↦f(r,z) is differentiable at every s∈Ns\in Ns∈N. The two last almost-everywhere assertions may initially use different null exceptional sets, but each assertion uses a single exceptional set valid for all s∈Ns\in Ns∈N. The neighborhood for slice measurability need not equal NNN, and NNN need not itself be open. Almost everywhere strongly measurable means equal almost everywhere to a strongly measurable function. The derivative notation uses the total real derivative, whose value is zero wherever differentiability fails; actual differentiability on NNN is separately imposed almost everywhere as stated. No pointwise nonnegativity of bbb is separately required, though the bound forces b≥0b\geq0b≥0 almost everywhere since t∈Nt\in Nt∈N. There is no restriction on ttt or requirement that QQQ be nonzero, finite, or a probability measure; the zero measure satisfies this predicate for every fff and ttt. Dimension zero is included.

SpaceRegularAt. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on Rd\mathbb R^dRd, any function F:Rd×Rd→RdF:\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^dF:Rd×Rd→Rd, and any x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd, this predicate means that z↦F(x,z)z\mapsto F(x,z)z↦F(x,z) is Bochner integrable with respect to QQQ; there exists a neighborhood of xxx on which every slice z↦F(y,z)z\mapsto F(y,z)z↦F(y,z) is almost everywhere strongly measurable with respect to QQQ; the continuous-linear-map-valued function z↦D[y↦F(y,z)](x)z\mapsto D[y\mapsto F(y,z)](x)z↦D[y↦F(y,z)](x) is almost everywhere strongly measurable with respect to QQQ; and there exist a set N⊆RdN\subseteq\mathbb R^dN⊆Rd containing an open neighborhood of xxx and a Bochner-integrable real function bbb on (Rd,Q)(\mathbb R^d,Q)(Rd,Q) such that, for QQQ-almost every zzz, ∥D[w↦F(w,z)](y)∥≤b(z)\|D[w\mapsto F(w,z)](y)\|\leq b(z)∥D[w↦F(w,z)](y)∥≤b(z) for every y∈Ny\in Ny∈N, and, for QQQ-almost every zzz, the function w↦F(w,z)w\mapsto F(w,z)w↦F(w,z) is real Fréchet differentiable at every y∈Ny\in Ny∈N. The norm on derivatives is the operator norm induced by the coordinate maximum norms. Each of the last two almost-everywhere assertions has an exceptional set independent of y∈Ny\in Ny∈N; those two exceptional sets need not initially be identical. The neighborhood for slice measurability need not be NNN, and NNN need not itself be open. Almost everywhere strongly measurable means equal almost everywhere to a strongly measurable function. Fréchet derivatives are assigned the zero map at nondifferentiable points, while differentiability on NNN is separately required almost everywhere. No global pointwise nonnegativity of bbb is stipulated, although the bound implies its nonnegativity almost everywhere. No finiteness, nonzeroness, or probability condition on QQQ is imposed; the zero measure satisfies the predicate for every FFF and xxx. Dimension zero is included, and in that dimension the predicate holds for every QQQ, FFF, and xxx because all vector values and derivatives are zero.

DensityHypotheses. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on Rd\mathbb R^dRd, and any function ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R, this proposition consists of four requirements: for every real ttt with 0≤t≤10\leq t\leq10≤t≤1 and every x,z∈Rdx,z\in\mathbb R^dx,z∈Rd, ρ(t,x,z)>0\rho(t,x,z)>0ρ(t,x,z)>0; for every such ttt, (x,z)↦ρ(t,x,z)(x,z)\mapsto\rho(t,x,z)(x,z)↦ρ(t,x,z) is measurable on the product Borel measurable space Rd×Rd\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^dRd×Rd; for every such ttt and every zzz, x↦ρ(t,x,z)x\mapsto\rho(t,x,z)x↦ρ(t,x,z) is everywhere nonnegative, is Bochner integrable with respect to canonical product Lebesgue volume, and has integral 111; and for every such ttt and every xxx, z↦ρ(t,x,z)z\mapsto\rho(t,x,z)z↦ρ(t,x,z) is Bochner integrable with respect to QQQ. All spatial points and conditioning points are quantified pointwise, not almost everywhere. There are no conditions at times outside [0,1][0,1][0,1], no joint measurability requirement involving time, and no requirement that QQQ be a probability measure or a finite measure. Dimension zero is included: then ρ\rhoρ at the unique pair of spatial points must equal 111 for each t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1], and the last requirement forces QQQ to have finite total mass.

AnalyticHypotheses. For any natural number ddd, any measure QQQ on Rd\mathbb R^dRd, and any functions ρ:R×Rd×Rd→R\rho:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb Rρ:R×Rd×Rd→R and v:R×Rd×Rd→Rdv:\mathbb R\times\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^dv:R×Rd×Rd→Rd, this proposition requires the following for every 0<t<10<t<10<t<1 and every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb R^dx∈Rd. First, z↦ρ(t,x,z)z\mapsto\rho(t,x,z)z↦ρ(t,x,z) is Bochner integrable with respect to QQQ; the slices z↦ρ(s,x,z)z\mapsto\rho(s,x,z)z↦ρ(s,x,z) are almost everywhere strongly measurable for every sss in some neighborhood of ttt; z↦∂sρ(t,x,z)z\mapsto\partial_s\rho(t,x,z)z↦∂s​ρ(t,x,z) is almost everywhere strongly measurable; and there exist a neighborhood set NNN of ttt and an integrable real function bbb of zzz such that, almost everywhere in zzz, ∣∂sρ(s,x,z)∣≤b(z)|\partial_s\rho(s,x,z)|\leq b(z)∣∂s​ρ(s,x,z)∣≤b(z) for all s∈Ns\in Ns∈N, and, almost everywhere in zzz, r↦ρ(r,x,z)r\mapsto\rho(r,x,z)r↦ρ(r,x,z) is differentiable at every s∈Ns\in Ns∈N. Second, writing Ht(y,z)=ρ(t,y,z)v(t,y,z)H_t(y,z)=\rho(t,y,z)v(t,y,z)Ht​(y,z)=ρ(t,y,z)v(t,y,z), the vector function z↦Ht(x,z)z\mapsto H_t(x,z)z↦Ht​(x,z) is Bochner integrable; the slices z↦Ht(y,z)z\mapsto H_t(y,z)z↦Ht​(y,z) are almost everywhere strongly measurable for every yyy in some neighborhood of xxx; z↦D[Ht(⋅,z)](x)z\mapsto D[H_t(\cdot,z)](x)z↦D[Ht​(⋅,z)](x) is almost everywhere strongly measurable as a continuous-linear-map-valued function; and there exist a neighborhood set MMM of xxx and an integrable real function ccc of zzz such that, almost everywhere in zzz, ∥D[Ht(⋅,z)](y)∥≤c(z)\|D[H_t(\cdot,z)](y)\|\leq c(z)∥D[Ht​(⋅,z)](y)∥≤c(z) for all y∈My\in My∈M, and, almost everywhere in zzz, Ht(⋅,z)H_t(\cdot,z)Ht​(⋅,z) is real Fréchet differentiable at every y∈My\in My∈M. Derivative norms are operator norms for the coordinate maximum norm; the scalar derivative uses absolute value. Almost everywhere strong measurability means agreement almost everywhere with a strongly measurable function. Neighborhood sets contain open neighborhoods and need not be open themselves; the measurability neighborhoods may differ from the derivative neighborhoods. Each displayed uniform almost-everywhere requirement has one null exceptional set valid throughout its neighborhood, and the choices of neighborhoods, bounds, and exceptional sets may depend on ttt and xxx. Both derivative operations return zero at points of nondifferentiability, with differentiability additionally required as specified. No conditions at the endpoints or outside (0,1)(0,1)(0,1), positivity, normalization, continuity equation, or probability assumption on QQQ are included. The zero measure makes all these requirements hold for arbitrary ρ\rhoρ and vvv. Dimension zero is included; its spatial requirements are automatic and its temporal requirements remain as stated on the one-point measured space.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 24, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by MiltMont · Sep 24, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me