Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The Born rule: probabilities of a complete disjoint family sum to one

Proved
CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.sum_probability_eq_one

by Bingyu Xia · Sep 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

categorical-quantum-mechanics

Let C\mathcal{C}C be a monoidal dagger category with zero morphisms, let a:I→ca : I \to ca:I→c be a state, and let x:I→Eff(c)x : I \to \mathrm{Eff}(c)x:I→Eff(c) be a family of effects carrying a dagger biproduct. If xxx is complete and disjoint, then the probabilities of the outcomes sum to the identity scalar:

∑iProb(a,xi)=idI,\sum_i \mathrm{Prob}(a, x_i) = \mathrm{id}_I ,i∑​Prob(a,xi​)=idI​,

where Prob(a,xi)=a†∘xi†∘xi∘a\mathrm{Prob}(a, x_i) = a^\dagger \circ x_i^\dagger \circ x_i \circ aProb(a,xi​)=a†∘xi†​∘xi​∘a. This is the categorical Born rule, and the goal of this mission. The source states it for complete families only; disjointness is required as well, and its own proof invokes Lemma 2.52, whose hypothesis is complete and disjoint. Without disjointness the statement is false: in C=Hilb\mathcal{C} = \mathbf{Hilb}C=Hilb, take x1=⟨e1∣x_1 = \langle e_1 |x1​=⟨e1​∣ and x2=⟨e1∣+⟨e2∣x_2 = \langle e_1 | + \langle e_2 |x2​=⟨e1​∣+⟨e2​∣, which are complete but not disjoint, and a=∣e1⟩a = |e_1\ranglea=∣e1​⟩; the two probabilities are 111 and 222.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_CQM_DaggerCategory
import Definitions.Def_CQM_DaggerBiproduct
import Definitions.Def_CQM_MonoidalCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic

open CategoryTheory Limits
open scoped BigOperators
open CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
universe u v
Formal statement
theorem CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.sum_probability_eq_one {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory C] [CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory C] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] {ι : Type} [Fintype ι] {c : C} (x : ι → CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect c) [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct fun (x : ι) => CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C] [CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory.IsDaggerBiproduct fun (x : ι) => CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C] (hx : CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.Complete x) (hxd : CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.Disjoint x) (a : CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.State c) (ha : CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory.IsIsometry a) : ∑ i : ι, CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.probability a (x i) =
  CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct.id (CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C) := by sorry
Source
Reutter & Vicary, *Categorical Quantum Mechanics*, §2.4.3, Proposition 2.55 (Born rule) Lean source: https://github.com/BryceT233/Categorical-Quantum-Mechanics/blob/dd7d4573fabdb5ca8af0811c1af6396a49365b42/FQFP/CQM/Category/Measurement.lean#L212
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 30, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Bingyu Xia · Sep 30, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me