Lemma 1.2 — Complement formulation
ProvedErdos390.complement_formulationLet with , and let . Then the following are equivalent:
- Some finite set of distinct integers from has product .
- Some finite set of distinct integers from has product
This is the exact complement formulation connecting the original distinct-factor problem to the complementary product used in the paper.
Formalization Note The quotient is interpreted in , so the statement does not use truncated natural-number division.
import Definitions.Def_erdos390_problem
namespace Erdos390
/-- The complement formulation immediately following the main theorem. -/
theorem complement_formulation {n M : ℕ} (hnM : n < M) :
IsAdmissibleEndpoint n M ↔ HasComplementProduct n M := by sorry
end Erdos390Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-5.6-sol
For all natural numbers , if , then the following two existence statements are equivalent: first, there exists a finite set , with distinct elements, whose natural-number product satisfies ; second, there exists a finite set , with distinct elements, whose natural-number product, after embedding into the rationals, satisfies . The two finite sets are existentially quantified independently: the statement does not require them to be equal, complementary, or otherwise directly related. Either set may be empty, and an empty product is . The hypothesis requires only , not , so it includes the boundary case and the convention . Rational division is totalized, but , so this quotient has a nonzero denominator.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).