Prove2Me
Navigate
MissionsFormalpediaUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Ranked descent from a duplicate-free hindsight cover

Open
BanditAlgorithm.partial_monitoring_duplicate_free_pareto_cover_ranked_descent_from_hindsight

by Harry_Xu · Aug 13, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

banditsconvex-geometrygraph-theorypartial-monitoring

Let SSS be a nonempty, duplicate-free collection of Pareto-optimal actions in a finite partial-monitoring game. Assume that every finite outcome sequence has a hindsight-optimal action in SSS. Then, for every mixed outcome lambda\\lambdalambda in the probability simplex, there is a root and a natural-number rank such that every non-root binSb\\in SbinS has a neighbouring successor cinSc\\in ScinS satisfying

langleLc,lambdarangleleqlangleLb,lambdaranglequadtextandquadoperatornamerank(c)<operatornamerank(b).\\langle L_c,\\lambda\\rangle\\leq\\langle L_b,\\lambda\\rangle \\quad\\text{and}\\quad \\operatorname{rank}(c)<\\operatorname{rank}(b).langleLc​,lambdarangleleqlangleLb​,lambdaranglequadtextandquadoperatornamerank(c)<operatornamerank(b).

Thus the Pareto-cell adjacency graph admits a terminating, non-increasing in-tree toward a lambda\\lambdalambda-optimal region, including boundary mixtures where several actions tie. The hindsight-cover assumption ensures that no Pareto region needed by the geometric argument was omitted.

Formalization Note Duplicate-freeness is expressed extensionally by equality of all loss coordinates implying equality of actions; decreasing natural-number ranks encode acyclicity.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_PartialMonitoringGame

open scoped BigOperators
Formal statement
theorem BanditAlgorithm.partial_monitoring_duplicate_free_pareto_cover_ranked_descent_from_hindsight
    {k d : ℕ} {𝕊 : Type*}
    (G : PartialMonitoringGame k d 𝕊) (hd : 0 < d)
    (S : Finset (Fin k)) (hSne : S.Nonempty)
    (hpareto : ∀ a ∈ S, ParetoOptimalAction G a)
    (hunique : ∀ a ∈ S, ∀ b ∈ S,
      (∀ i, G.L a i = G.L b i) → a = b)
    (hbest : ∀ (n : ℕ) (out : Fin n → Fin d), ∃ b ∈ S, ∀ a : Fin k,
      ∑ t, G.L b (out t) ≤ ∑ t, G.L a (out t)) :
    ∀ lam : Fin d → ℝ, lam ∈ stdSimplex ℝ (Fin d) →
      ∃ root ∈ S, ∃ rank : Fin k → ℕ,
        ∀ b ∈ S, b ≠ root →
          ∃ c ∈ S, NeighbouringActions G b c ∧
            ∑ i : Fin d, G.L c i * lam i ≤
              ∑ i : Fin d, G.L b i * lam i ∧
            rank c < rank b := by
  sorry
Source
Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesvári, Bandit Algorithms, Cambridge University Press (2020), Lemma 37.7 p. 484, Exercise 37.10 p. 509, and Lemma 37.21 pp. 501–502, especially the finite-subsequence boundary argument. https://tor-lattimore.com/downloads/book/book.pdf

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeLaunch a missionPropose a formalization projectFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions.

How Prove2Me works
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactJoin Slack© 2026 Prove2Me