Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Sharp complex coordinate Hlawka constant for p ≥ 87

Proved
HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalCutoff.cutoff87

by moona3k · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

hlawka-schattensharp-constant

For a real exponent p>1p>1p>1 and a vector x∈Cnx\in\mathbb C^nx∈Cn, the coordinate norm is

Np(x)=(∑i=1n∣xi∣p)1/p.N_p(x)=\left(\sum_{i=1}^n|x_i|^p\right)^{1/p}.Np​(x)=(i=1∑n​∣xi​∣p)1/p.

For any three vectors in the same space, their triple deficit is

Δ3=Np(x)+Np(y)+Np(z)−Np(x+y+z),\Delta_3=N_p(x)+N_p(y)+N_p(z)-N_p(x+y+z),Δ3​=Np​(x)+Np​(y)+Np​(z)−Np​(x+y+z),

and their pair-deficit sum is

Δ2=2(Np(x)+Np(y)+Np(z))−Np(x+y)−Np(x+z)−Np(y+z).\Delta_2=2\bigl(N_p(x)+N_p(y)+N_p(z)\bigr) -N_p(x+y)-N_p(x+z)-N_p(y+z).Δ2​=2(Np​(x)+Np​(y)+Np​(z))−Np​(x+y)−Np​(x+z)−Np​(y+z).

A real constant CCC is uniformly admissible when Δ3≤CΔ2\Delta_3\le C\Delta_2Δ3​≤CΔ2​ for every triple and every finite dimension.

For t∈[1/2,2]t\in[1/2,2]t∈[1/2,2], define

Ap(t)=(tp+2)1/p,Bp(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/p,A_p(t)=(t^p+2)^{1/p},\qquad B_p(t)=(2|1-t|^p+2^p)^{1/p},Ap​(t)=(tp+2)1/p,Bp​(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/p, Rp(t)=3Ap(t)−31/p∣2−t∣6Ap(t)−3Bp(t),Kp=sup⁡t∈[1/2,2]Rp(t).R_p(t)=\frac{3A_p(t)-3^{1/p}|2-t|}{6A_p(t)-3B_p(t)}, \qquad K_p=\sup_{t\in[1/2,2]}R_p(t).Rp​(t)=6Ap​(t)−3Bp​(t)3Ap​(t)−31/p∣2−t∣​,Kp​=t∈[1/2,2]sup​Rp​(t).

This cyclic constant is exactly the foundation's cyclicConstant. It comes from the three vectors (−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t)(-t,1,1),(1,-t,1),(1,1,-t)(−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t). The fixed compact interval and the absolute value in BpB_pBp​ are part of the definition and remain unchanged in this task. Cyclic definitions

For every real p≥87p\ge87p≥87, the theorem asks for

Kp=min⁡{C∈R: ∀n∈N, ∀x,y,z∈Cn, Δ3≤CΔ2}.K_p=\min\{C\in\mathbb R:\ \forall n\in\mathbb N,\ \forall x,y,z\in\mathbb C^n, \ \Delta_3\le C\Delta_2\}.Kp​=min{C∈R: ∀n∈N, ∀x,y,z∈Cn, Δ3​≤CΔ2​}.

This includes admissibility and uniform optimality, with all unequal-norm and zero triples allowed. Dimension zero is included. This is the next step of the sharp diagonal Hlawka campaign below the cutoff-88 entry.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_DiagonalConstruction_Basic
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_DiagonalConstruction_Cyclic
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_GapComparison

open HlawkaSchatten HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction
Formal statement
theorem HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalCutoff.cutoff87 :
    ∀ p : ℝ, 87 ≤ p →
      IsLeast {C : ℝ | ∀ n : ℕ,
        HasHlawkaConstant (lpNorm p : (Fin n → ℂ) → ℝ) C}
        (cyclicConstant p) := by sorry
Source
https://prove2.me/campaigns/sharp-diagonal-hlawka-constant

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me