Corollary 3.5: cognitive closure of a CWO set and its complement
ProvedCogCons.cognitiveClosure_of_cwoconsequence-operatorlogictopology
If , then
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_CogCons_consequence_space open CogCons.CognitiveConsequenceSpace
Formal statement
namespace CogCons
theorem cognitiveClosure_of_cwo {C : Type*} (S : CognitiveConsequenceSpace C) (A : Set C)
(hA : S.IsCWO A) :
S.cognitiveClosure A ≠ A ∧ S.cognitiveClosure Aᶜ = Aᶜ := by sorry
end CogConsSource
S. Acharjee and U. Gogoi, *The limit of human intelligence*, arXiv:2310.10792v2 [math.GM] (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10792, Corollary 3.5 (p. 8)
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)
Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted these Lean statements, not by an independent auditor working blind from the code alone. The author knew the intended meaning while writing it, so it may read that intent into the code. Do not treat it as independent verification; compare the Lean code against the source directly.
For every type , every cognitive-consequence space on and every with : writing for the intersection of all with and , one has and .
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.