p_adic_langlands_conjecture
Proved⚠️ Retired — incorrect formalization
The Lean statement below does not express the result
p_adic_langlands_conjectureis named for, so itsProvedstatus carries no information about it. Do not import it or use it as a dependency.
p-adic Langlands program: For GL₂(ℚₚ), there is a correspondence between p-adic representations of Gal(ℚ̄ₚ/ℚₚ) and p-adic Banach space representations of GL₂(ℚₚ). Proved for GL₂ (Breuil-Mézard, Colmez, Kisin); general GLₙ and other groups open.
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
import Mathlib
theorem p_adic_langlands_conjecture (p : ℕ) (hp : Nat.Prime p) (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
∀ (rho : (ZMod p → ZMod p) → Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) (ZMod p)),
∃ (pi : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) (ZMod p) → ℤ),
True := by
sorry
The goal is ∀ rho, ∃ (pi : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) (ZMod p) → ℤ), True, witnessed by the constant-zero function. No Galois representation, no p-adic Banach representation and no correspondence between them appears; rho and pi are arbitrary maps between finite matrix types.
What a faithful statement would require
Genuine Galois representations and p-adic representations of GL₂(ℚ_p) are needed, together with the assertion that the correspondence between them is a bijection with the expected compatibilities.
No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib
import Mathlib
theorem p_adic_langlands_conjecture (p : ℕ) (hp : Nat.Prime p) (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
∀ (rho : (ZMod p → ZMod p) → Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) (ZMod p)),
∃ (pi : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) (ZMod p) → ℤ),
True := by
sorry