UCB pull-count ceiling bound (Eq. 7.10)
ProvedBanditAlgorithm.ucb_suboptimal_arm_expected_pull_count_ceiling_boundbandit-algorithmsprobabilityucb
For UCB at confidence level on a finite 1-subgaussian stochastic bandit, the expected number of pulls of any suboptimal arm is at most . This is the pre-rounding estimate in the proof of Theorem 7.1. The case is included explicitly by the formal statement.
Formal statement
import Definitions.Def_banditRegret
import Definitions.Def_ucbPolicy
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace BanditAlgorithm
/-!
Source: Lattimore--Szepesvári, *Bandit Algorithms* (CUP 2020), proof of
Theorem 7.1, printed pp. 105--108 (PDF pp. 114--117), especially Eqs.
(7.5)--(7.10). This is Eq. (7.10) after setting `δ = 1 / n²` and `c = 1/2`;
the source's final display then uses `ceil x ≤ x + 1` and `1 / n ≤ 1`.
The `n = 1` boundary is included: the displayed right side is then `2`, while
the pull count is at most one. The positive-gap hypothesis makes the denominator
nonzero, and `hn` makes the reciprocal horizon well-defined.
-/
theorem ucb_suboptimal_arm_expected_pull_count_ceiling_bound
{k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) {ν : StochasticBandit k}
(hν : IsSubgaussianBandit 1 ν) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
{π : BanditPolicy k} (hπ : IsUCBPolicy (1 / (n : ℝ) ^ 2) π)
(i : Fin k) (hi : 0 < banditGap ν i) :
∫ h, (armPullCount i h : ℝ) ∂(banditMeasure ν π n) ≤
((⌈16 * Real.log n / (banditGap ν i) ^ 2⌉₊ : ℕ) : ℝ) +
1 + 1 / (n : ℝ) := by
sorry
end BanditAlgorithm
Source
Lattimore--Szepesvari, Bandit Algorithms (CUP 2020), proof of Theorem 7.1, printed pp. 105--108 (PDF pp. 114--117), Eqs. (7.5)--(7.10), especially Eq. (7.10) after choosing c=1/2; https://tor-lattimore.com/downloads/book/book.pdf