Arbitrarily long residence near the subcritical saddle-centers
ProvedBirkhoffGlobalSection.saddle_center_arbitrarily_long_residencedynamical-systemssymplectic-geometry
Let be any open neighborhood of both , and prescribe . There are an open neighborhood of both saddles and constants such that, for
any closed solution of the Levi–Civita Hamiltonian on the selected left component with period satisfies
The period need not be minimal. This supplies a long resident segment without assuming anything about the variational flow or its winding.
Formalization Note This is the slow-passage assertion in the proof of Theorem 1.8, specialized to the subcritical side as in Section 10 and expressed in Levi–Civita coordinates. The strict period bound includes the exclusion of local subcritical periodic orbits; mere smallness of the vector field is not the full assertion.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffGlobalSection_DynamicalConvexity
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffGlobalSection
/-- Slow passage near the two saddle-centers: after shrinking a neighborhood
and the parameter strip, every subcritical periodic orbit meeting the smaller
neighborhood has a prescribed-length segment inside the original one. The
strict period bound uses the absence of local subcritical Lyapunov orbits. -/
theorem saddle_center_arbitrarily_long_residence
(U : Set Phase) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hplus : (![1 / 2, 0, 0, 0] : Phase) ∈ U)
(hminus : (![-(1 / 2), 0, 0, 0] : Phase) ∈ U)
(L : ℝ) (hL : 0 < L) :
∃ V : Set Phase, IsOpen V ∧ V ⊆ U ∧
(![1 / 2, 0, 0, 0] : Phase) ∈ V ∧ (![-(1 / 2), 0, 0, 0] : Phase) ∈ V ∧
∃ ε η : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ 0 < η ∧
∀ μ c : ℝ, 0 < μ → μ < 1 →
|μ - 1 / 2| < ε → c < 2 + η → belowFirstCriticalValue μ c →
∀ (x : ℝ → Phase) (T : ℝ),
IsPeriodicHamiltonianSolutionIn (leviCivitaHamiltonian μ c)
(leftEnergyComponent μ c) x T →
(∃ t : ℝ, x t ∈ V) →
L < T ∧ ∃ a : ℝ, ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc a (a + L), x t ∈ U := by sorry
end BirkhoffGlobalSection
Source
Liu–Salomão, Finite energy foliations and global dynamics in the restricted three-body problem, https://arxiv.org/html/2506.17867v2#S7. Proof of Theorem 1.8, paragraphs choosing U_1 and U_2 and asserting T > b-a with arbitrarily large residence time; Section 6.1 saddle-center description; Section 10 subcritical application. Neighborhood-refinement formulation in Levi–Civita coordinates.