Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Branch-regular principal winding is a first integral

Proved
WindingDynamics.branchRegularConservation

by lisamegawatts · Sep 19, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

algebraic-topologydynamical-systemsphase-slipsreset-ledgerwinding-number

For a finite directed edge set over any preconnected time space, assume every lifted vertex phase varies continuously and no oriented edge is ever antipodal, i.e. no raw edge difference meets the selected modular branch cut. Then the integer principal-turn pairing with every integer edge chain has the same value at every two times. The theorem also includes a counterexample showing that continuity of the two real endpoint trajectories alone does not preserve the principal turn.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_WindingDynamics_CoreV1
Formal statement
theorem WindingDynamics.branchRegularConservation : WindingDynamics.BranchRegularConservationGate := by sorry
Source
MonumentalSystems/LeanProofs, CircleFundamentalGroupWindingV1 and FiniteTorusPrincipalResetEventV1 at commit b656238b73d5f0f74515f6574a1dcb4e0216129f (2026-09-18); theorem contract independently reconstructed over Mathlib 4.30.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-5.6-sol

This theorem is the conjunction of two assertions. First, for every small time type TTT, vertex type VVV, and finite small edge type EEE, every topology and preconnected-space structure on TTT, every pair of maps tail,head:E→V\mathrm{tail},\mathrm{head}:E\to Vtail,head:E→V, and every phase function ϕ:T→V→R\phi:T\to V\to\mathbb Rϕ:T→V→R, assume that t↦ϕ(t,v)t\mapsto\phi(t,v)t↦ϕ(t,v) is continuous for each v∈Vv\in Vv∈V and that ϕ(t,head(e))−ϕ(t,tail(e))≢−π(mod2π)\phi(t,\mathrm{head}(e))-\phi(t,\mathrm{tail}(e))\not\equiv-\pi\pmod{2\pi}ϕ(t,head(e))−ϕ(t,tail(e))≡−π(mod2π) for every t∈Tt\in Tt∈T and e∈Ee\in Ee∈E. Then, for every integer edge chain c:E→Zc:E\to\mathbb Zc:E→Z and every t0,t1∈Tt_0,t_1\in Tt0​,t1​∈T, the two integers ∑e∈Ekt0,ec(e)\sum_{e\in E}k_{t_0,e}c(e)∑e∈E​kt0​,e​c(e) and ∑e∈Ekt1,ec(e)\sum_{e\in E}k_{t_1,e}c(e)∑e∈E​kt1​,e​c(e) are equal, where kt,ek_{t,e}kt,e​ is the integer correction for which ϕ(t,head(e))−ϕ(t,tail(e))+2πkt,e∈(−π,π]\phi(t,\mathrm{head}(e))-\phi(t,\mathrm{tail}(e))+2\pi k_{t,e}\in(-\pi,\pi]ϕ(t,head(e))−ϕ(t,tail(e))+2πkt,e​∈(−π,π]. Thus orientation is explicitly tail-to-head, and the correction has the negative-quotient sign. Second, there exist globally continuous functions a,b:R→Ra,b:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Ra,b:R→R such that the corresponding correction integers at real parameters 000 and 111 are unequal. The existential assertion imposes no antipodality avoidance. The first assertion has no topology or finiteness assumption on VVV, no joint-continuity requirement, and no cycle or closed-chain requirement on ccc. It is vacuous for an empty time type because there are no t0,t1t_0,t_1t0​,t1​, gives an automatically zero sum for an empty edge type, and is vacuous whenever either premise is unsatisfied. PreconnectedSpace is not accompanied by a nonemptiness hypothesis. The quantified types are Type, not arbitrary universe-polymorphic Type u.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 22, 2026

  • Endorsed by lisamegawatts · Sep 22, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me