Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A complete disjoint family of effects lifts to a unitary

Proved
CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.isUnitary_lift_of_complete_disjoint

by Bingyu Xia · Sep 30, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

categorical-quantum-mechanics

Let C\mathcal{C}C be a monoidal dagger category with zero morphisms and let x:I→Eff(c)x : I \to \mathrm{Eff}(c)x:I→Eff(c) be a family of effects carrying a dagger biproduct. If xxx is both complete and disjoint, then its lift

⟨x⟩:⨁iI⟶c\langle x \rangle : \bigoplus_i I \longrightarrow c⟨x⟩:i⨁​I⟶c

is a unitary, that is ⟨x⟩†∘⟨x⟩=id\langle x \rangle^\dagger \circ \langle x \rangle = \mathrm{id}⟨x⟩†∘⟨x⟩=id and ⟨x⟩∘⟨x⟩†=id\langle x \rangle \circ \langle x \rangle^\dagger = \mathrm{id}⟨x⟩∘⟨x⟩†=id. The source states this under an additional hypothesis of equalizers; that hypothesis is not needed here, since completeness alone already forces y=0y = 0y=0 from y∘⟨x⟩=0y \circ \langle x \rangle = 0y∘⟨x⟩=0, so the statement below is strictly stronger than the book's.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_CQM_DaggerCategory
import Definitions.Def_CQM_DaggerBiproduct
import Definitions.Def_CQM_MonoidalCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic

open CategoryTheory Limits
open scoped BigOperators
open CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
universe u v
Formal statement
theorem CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.isUnitary_lift_of_complete_disjoint {C : Type u} [CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] [CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory C] [CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory C] [CategoryTheory.Preadditive C] {ι : Type} {c : C} (x : ι → CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect c) [CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct fun (x : ι) => CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C] [CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory.IsDaggerBiproduct fun (x : ι) => CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C] (hx : CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.Complete x) (hxd : CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.Effect.Disjoint x) : CategoryTheory.DaggerCategory.IsUnitary (CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift x) := by sorry
Source
Reutter & Vicary, *Categorical Quantum Mechanics*, §2.4.3, Lemma 2.53 Lean source: https://github.com/BryceT233/Categorical-Quantum-Mechanics/blob/dd7d4573fabdb5ca8af0811c1af6396a49365b42/FQFP/CQM/Category/Measurement.lean#L167
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 30, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Bingyu Xia · Sep 30, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me