Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (2.2), p. 246 — the cut of the center of gravity method removes only points where f exceeds f(c_t), so x* ∈ S_t

Proved
ConvexOptAlg.CenterGravity.eq_2_2

by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

center-of-gravityconvex-optimizationcutting-planep2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-bookp2o-v1

Let X⊂Rn\mathcal X\subset\mathbb R^nX⊂Rn be a convex body and f:X→[−B,B]f:\mathcal X\to[-B,B]f:X→[−B,B] continuous and convex, and let x∗∈Xx^*\in\mathcal Xx∗∈X satisfy f(x∗)=min⁡x∈Xf(x)f(x^*)=\min_{x\in\mathcal X}f(x)f(x∗)=minx∈X​f(x). Let (St,ct,wt)t≥1(\mathcal S_t,c_t,w_t)_{t\ge1}(St​,ct​,wt​)t≥1​ be a run of the center of gravity method on X\mathcal XX for fff. Then for every t≥1t\ge1t≥1,

St∖St+1⊂{x∈X:(x−ct)⊤wt>0}⊂{x∈X:f(x)>f(ct)},\mathcal S_t\setminus\mathcal S_{t+1}\subset\{x\in\mathcal X:(x-c_t)^\top w_t>0\}\subset\{x\in\mathcal X: f(x)>f(c_t)\},St​∖St+1​⊂{x∈X:(x−ct​)⊤wt​>0}⊂{x∈X:f(x)>f(ct​)},

and the optimal point is never removed:

x∗∈St.x^*\in\mathcal S_t .x∗∈St​.

This is display (2.2) in the proof of Theorem 2.1 together with the consequence drawn from it in the next sentence. It says that each cut discards only points that are strictly worse than the point just queried.

Formalization Note The standing assumptions of Chapter 2 (convex body, continuity, convexity and the bound ∣f∣≤B|f|\le B∣f∣≤B on X\mathcal XX) and the existence of the minimizer x∗x^*x∗ (the book's standing notation, p. 242) are hypotheses. Subgradients are relative to X\mathcal XX (Definition 1.2).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ConvexOptAlg_CenterGravity_Defs

open MeasureTheory
open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace ConvexOptAlg.CenterGravity

/-- Bubeck, arXiv:1405.4980v2, proof of Theorem 2.1, display (2.2) and the sentence after it, p. 246.
For a run `(S, c, w)` of the center of gravity method on the convex body `X` for a continuous convex
`f : X → [-B, B]` with minimizer `x*`, and every `t ≥ 1`:
`S_t \ S_{t+1} ⊂ {x ∈ X : (x - c_t)ᵀ w_t > 0} ⊂ {x ∈ X : f(x) > f(c_t)}` (2.2), and `x* ∈ S_t`. -/
theorem eq_2_2 {n : ℕ} {X : Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))} (hX : IsConvexBody X)
    {f : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ} {B : ℝ} (hfB : ∀ x ∈ X, |f x| ≤ B)
    (hfc : ContinuousOn f X) (hfconv : ConvexOn ℝ X f)
    {xstar : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)} (hxstar : xstar ∈ X) (hmin : ∀ y ∈ X, f xstar ≤ f y)
    {S : ℕ → Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))} {c w : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)}
    (hrun : IsCenterOfGravityRun X f S c w) (t : ℕ) (ht : 1 ≤ t) :
    (S t \ S (t + 1) ⊆ {x | x ∈ X ∧ 0 < ⟪x - c t, w t⟫_ℝ} ∧
      {x | x ∈ X ∧ 0 < ⟪x - c t, w t⟫_ℝ} ⊆ {x | x ∈ X ∧ f (c t) < f x}) ∧
    xstar ∈ S t := by sorry

end ConvexOptAlg.CenterGravity
Source
Bubeck, arXiv:1405.4980v2, proof of Theorem 2.1, Eq. (2.2) and the sentence following it, p. 246
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me